US admits inconsistency in describing Jammu Kashmir, but no policy change

WASHINGTON: US officers have stated that there have been inconsistencies in the American description of Jammu and Kashmir however insisted there has been no trade in its policy saying the tempo scope and individual of any discussion on Kashmir is for India and Pakistan to decide. Our policy on Kashmir has not modified a State Department spokesperson instructed PTI. The explanation came after questions had been raised approximately the distinct methods america has defined Jammu and Kashmir. Recently in certainly one of its statements the USA described it as Indian administered Jammu and Kashmir and this week it said the Indian State of Jammu and Kashmir . In June while designating Pakistan-based totally Hizbul Mujahideen chief Syed Salahuddin as a especially-certain global terrorist the State Department had stated the militant group has claimed duty for several attacks http://www.filmtv.it/nick/92525/thoughtforquote/ inclusive of the April 2014 attack in Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir . India but had performed down the nomenclature by the USA saying comparable phrases were used formerly too. In the past the United States had also used India-held Kashmir . In the modern day Country Report on Terrorism 2016  released on Wednesday the United States used Azad Jammu and Kashmir to explain Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The use of the word Azad Jammu and Kashmir via the State Department was strongly hostile with the aid of the Indian Government. US officers stated that there have been inconsistency within the American way of describing Jammu and Kashmir however insisted there has been no alternate in its coverage. Our coverage on Kashmir has no longer changed. The pace scope and man or woman of any discussions on Kashmir is for the two aspects to determine but we assist any and all effective steps India and Pakistan can take to forge closer family members the spokesperson said New Delhi inner problem of India. (File) Related News Bihar  CM Nitish Kumar reaches Rahul Gandhi s residence for talks will meet PM Modi laterShutdown protests in KashmirIn Gujarat poll run-up Shankersinh Vaghela exits Congress BJP greets him on b dayAttacking the Narendra Modi-led BJP authorities at the Centre over its failure in http://sharetv.com/user/thoughtforquotes controlling the situation in Jammu and Kashmir Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi said Mai kaafi samay se keh raha hoon ki Narendra Modi ji aur NDA ki guidelines ne Jammu Kashmir ko jala diya hai (I had been  announcing this for a long time that the guidelines of Narendra Modi and NDA has burned down JammuSRINAGAR: Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Mehbooba Mufti nowadays dismissed hints that the USA China or every other u . S . Have to mediate in Kashmir problem and stated India and Pakistan need to clear up the difficulty bilaterally. Be it America or China they must mind their very own business. Wherever America intervened you see (the state of affairs in) Afghanistan Syria and Iraq. China has its very own vexing problem in Tibet. So I assume we have a map here which is that we India and Pakistan have to speak even after struggle. We have to talk bilaterally and what can America Turkey or England do with us? Mehbooba told newshounds at Anantnag in south Kashmir. The leader minister changed into responding to a query on competition National Conference (NC) president and Member of Parliament Farooq Abdullah s notion of a 3rd birthday celebration mediation to solve the Kashmir issue. Abdullah the previous day stated India ought to take the assist of pals to solve the issue. Mehbooba asked Abdullah whether or not he wanted the scenario in Kashmir to be similar to what it became in countries like Syria Afghanistan and Iraq in which america had intervened. They have played spoilsport in fundamental troubles of the sector. See what they've made of Syria see the state of affairs of Afghanistan and Iraq. God forbid does Farooq (Abdullah) want our state of affairs much like them? Or he wants our state to prosper? The leader minister asked. She stated each India and Pakistan should respect the agreements among the 2 nations to end the hostilities. We ought to take ahead Shimla and Lahore agreements the way our elder leaders like (former PM) Indira Gandhi and (former PM Atal Bihari) Vajpayee did. Everyday our infantrymen and those die on border and the equal happens (in Pakistan) as properly. Some solution should come out for (ending) this and the answer will come best then when we both the international locations respect those agreements she said. The CM stated that talk is imperative as the two international locations face urgent development issues. We must sit collectively and stop poverty provide our humans with energy water and employment. India and Pakistan have to speak to every different she stated.
New Delhi: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Congress and Shiv Sena on Friday condemned National Conference leader Farooq Abdullah s proposal of third celebration mediation to remedy the Kashmir difficulty.Former Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Abdullah had cautioned that India must take the help of buddies to resolve the Kashmir problem drawing sharp reactions from the events. Abdullah need to stop advancing Pakistan s fake nuclear blackmail. Out of strength Abdullah is speakme the language of separatists and of Pakistan. His flip-flops on Kashmir reek of hypocrisy BJP spokesperson GVL Narsimha Rao said.He said Abdullah need to inform his friends in Pakistan to forestall exporting terror and meddling in Kashmir.Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi too flayed any strive for third birthday party intervention to resolve the difficulty pronouncing Kashmir is India .File picture of Farooq Abdullah. Image courtesy: Sameer Yasir It is being stated there have to be discussion on Kashmir with China and Pakistan however my opinion is that Kashmir is India and India is Kashmir and this is our internal matter... Our inner enterprise and no one ought to intrude in it he stated.Shiv Sena leader Arvind Sawant also deplored Abdullah s remark pronouncing Kashmir is our difficulty. Kashmir is India s and we are able to clear up the issue within the united states of america. Nobody else is required to intrude in our depend .Union minister Giriraj Singh stated it's far the government s clean coverage that it'll now not tolerate any intervention from a third celebration at the Kashmir trouble. Till Pakistan keeps on investment terrorists there might be no talks with Pakistan he stated.Criticising Abdullah s remarks Jammu and Kashmir s deputy chief minister Nirmal Singh said that Abdullah is out of power and frustated . What do you mean with the aid of 0.33 celebration? What is the stand of the complete united states of america? What is the resolution of Parliament? He wondered wondering whether or not Abdullah wishes India to bend its knees before Pakistan . I condemn this. I will ask him to apologise for such remarks he added.BJP MP Subramanian Swamy stated In my opinion Farooq Abdullah must visit some 1/3 usa...He isn't speaking in favour of India. Even Pakistan will no longer take delivery of him .Claiming that dialogue turned into the handiest answer for https://gitlab.com/thoughtforquote Kashmir Abdullah had stated The way out is through communicate. Use your pals... Use them for communicate to resolve the issue . Till what time ought to we wait? Should we wait for one thousand years? You must take the bull by using the horns. You must do it on occasion. They (Pakistan) have atom bomb so have you ever. How many people will you kill? This isn't the way he had stated. How many more wars will you fight? How an awful lot greater will you damage India? The cash you spent on shopping for planes materials for forces ... If you spend it on poor farmers India will prosper Abdullah stated.
Jammu and Kashmir deputy leader minister Nirmal Singh on Friday condemned former leader minister Farooq Abdullah s assertion that a third birthday party could be approached to remedy Kashmir difficulty ANI pronounced.Condemn his statement; need to inform him when he turned into CM he talked of attacking Pakistan. Why this 2-confronted method?: J An Army jawan was injured when the Pakistan army fired at Indian posts along the Line of Control (LoC) in Rajouri district of Jammu and Kashmir on Friday night a senior Army officer said on Saturday. The Pakistan army initiated small arms firing at the Indian Army posts in the Naushera sector at around 10.35 pm. There was a brief exchange of fire from both sides he said. One soldier sustained minor injuries on his left arm when a bullet ricocheted and hit him he said adding that the injured jawan was administered medical attention and was out of danger. There was no ceasefire violation today said the officer. In a similar incident in the Sunderbani sector of Jammu and Kashmir on Friday evening an Army personnel was grievously injured and succumbed to his injuries later. The Pakistani army initiated an unprovoked firing at Indian Army posts at around 6.05 pm for a brief period which was strongly and effectively retaliated by the Indian Army said the officer. In the ensuing fire exchange Rifleman Jayadrath Singh (28) was critically injured and died subsequently he added. Singh belonged to Deoband village in Saharanpur district of Uttar Pradesh. He is survived by wife Mamta Devi. Eleven persons including nine soldiers have been killed and 19 persons injured in a total of 18 ceasefire violations by the Pakistan Army along the LoC in Jammu and Kashmir in the last 10 days.
SRINAGAR: Pakistani troops today violated ceasefire along the Line of Control in Naugam sector for the third consecutive day and in Keran sector but there were no casualties in the unprovoked firing from across the LoC. An army official said the Indian Army is retaliating to the Pakistani aggression in equal measure. Pakistani troops violated ceasefire again in Naugam sector today by unprovoked firing towards our posts he said. The official said the Pakistani troops also violated ceasefire in Keran sector of Kupwara. This is the third ceasefire violation in Naugam sector within 24 hours. An Army jawan was killed in the ceasefire violation by Pakistan in Naugam sector on Wednesday. Pakistan has violated ceasefire in north Kashmir six times in the last nine days. On July 12 two soldiers - Lance Naik Ranjit Singh and Rifleman Satish Bhagat - were killed when they were targeted by Pakistani troops while manning forward posts in Keran sector of Kupwara district. Another jawan was injured when Pakistani troops resorted to unprovoked firing in Kamalkote area of Uri sector in Baramulla district.
Jammu: An Indian Army soldier was injured on Saturday in a ceasefire violation by the Pakistan Army on the Line of Control (LoC) in Rajouri district defence sources said.Representational image. ReutersThe soldier was injured in Lam sector of the LoC. The Pakistani Army is using small arms automatics and mortars defence ministry sources saidThe Indian Army was responding effectively and strongly he added.The firing exchanges were still on he said.On Friday Rifleman Jayadrath Singh of Raj Rifles was killed and Rifleman Sachin Kumar was injured in similar ceasefire violation in Sunderbani sector of the LoC.Atleast 11 persons including nine soldiers were killed and 18 people injured in 18 ceasefire violations by Pakistan this month.The army also foiled 16 infiltration bids until 11 July in which the security forces killed 36 militants.
Washington: The Trump administration will not give 350 million in coalition support fund to Pakistan after the US defence secretary said that he cannot certify that Islamabad has taken sufficient actions against the dreaded Haqqani terror network an official said on Friday.The Pentagon s decision came ahead of a review of US policy on Afghanistan and Pakistan.As a result of the notification by Defence Secretary James Mattis to Congress the Department of Defence has reprogrammed remaining Coalition Support Funds which is USD 350 million to other accounts Defence Department Spokesman Adam Stump said. Secretary Mattis has informed congressional defence committees that he was not able to certify that Pakistan has taken sufficient actions against the Haqqani Network to permit full reimbursement of Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 Coalition Support Funds (CSF) Stump said.File image of Pakistan s Waziristan region where the Haqqani network operates. AFPPakistan-based Haqqani network is blamed for a number of high-profile attacks on US and Western interests in war-torn Afghanistan.The terror group is also blamed for several deadly attacks against Indian interests in Afghanistan including the 2008 bombing of the Indian mission in Kabul that killed 58 people.This is for the second consecutive year that the US Defence Secretary has refused to certify to Congress as mandated under National Defence Authorisation Act (NDAA) that Pakistan has taken satisfactory action against the Haqqani network.The group is believed to be based in the unruly tribal regions of Pakistan near the porous border with Afghanistan. As authorised by the US Congress in its NDAA the Department of Defence reimbursed 550 of 900 million to Pakistan early in 2017.Mattis predecessor Ashton Carter was the first US Defence Secretary to refuse that certification. The funds ( 350 million) could not be released to the Government of Pakistan at this time because the secretary could not certify that Pakistan has taken sufficient action against the Haqqani Network as per the requirement in the FY 2016 NDAA Stump said. Pakistan has been reimbursed 550 million of the 900 million the country was authorised in FY16 CSF. With the Secretary s decision there is no additional FY16 CSF available to Pakistan. The Secretary decided to request reprogramming of the funds to retain the ability to use those funds for other requirements he said.As part of the regular defence department budgetary process the FY16 CSF money allotted for Pakistan needed to be released or reprogrammed prior to the expiration of the funding Stump said. This decision does not prejudge the conclusions of the White House review of South Asia strategy which is still ongoing Stump insisted articulating that this decision does not reduce the significance of the sacrifices that the Pakistani military has undertaken over previous years. We continue to be encouraged by Pakistan s operations in North Waziristan and elsewhere in the FATA. Pakistan s efforts have reduced the ability of some militant groups to use North Waziristan and the FATA as a safe haven for terrorism he said.However the Taliban and the Haqqani Network continue to operate in other locations in Pakistan Stump said two days after the State Department in a report to the Congress had listed Pakistan as one of the countries having terrorist safe havens. In our discussions with Pakistani officials we continue to stress that it is in the interest of Pakistan to eliminate all safe havens and reduce the operational capacity of all militant organisations that pose a threat to the US and Pakistani interests as well as regional stability he said.Noting that Pakistan has been reimbursed 550 million in FY16 CSF Stump said 300 million of FY2016 Coalition Support Funds were already rescinded as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2017. 50 million was the remaining amount available out of the 900 million authorised for Pakistan in FY16 CSF he said.Pakistan is authorised to receive up to 900 million in FY17 CSF. There is a similar certification requirement for Pakistan pertaining to 400 million of FY17 CSF. Pakistan still has time to take action against the Haqqani Network in order to influence the Secretary s certification decision in FY17 Stump said.The Coalition Support Fund (CSF) authority is not security assistance but rather reimbursements to key cooperating nations for logistical military and other support provided to US combat operations.Pakistan is the largest recipient of CSF reimbursements having received more than https://www.rockit.it/user/thoughtforquote 14 billion since 2002. CSF is just one component of the United States broad and enduring partnership with Pakistan Stump added.
Pakistan s Supreme Court today concluded hearing the high-profile Panama Papers case against Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his family for alleged corruption but reserved its verdict that could jeopardise his political future.File image of Pakistan s prime minister Nawaz Sharif. AFPThe three-member bench headed by Justice Ejaz Afzal and comprising Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed and Justice Ijazul Ahsan did not immediately give any date to give its judgement. Justice Saeed observed that the court will not deviate from any law while delivering its judgement. We are conscious of the fundamental rights of petitioners and respondents. The apex court also opened the final part of the 10- Volume report submitted by the Joint Investigation Team it had set up to probe the allegations of money laundering by Sharif. The JIT has recommended that the report s Volume-X should be treated as confidential as it contains the details of correspondence with other countries. Sharif s legal team has objected to it.The court has ordered authorities to provide a copy of the volume to Sharif s lawyer Khawaja Harris. Exercising their right to respond to the arguments by defence lawyers the petitioners in their brief remarks urged the court to disqualify Sharif and order a trial against him for allegedly hiding assets and failing to disclose the sources of income used to set up businesses by his children. The prime minister has failed to give satisfactory answer to the allegation of money laundering and should be disqualified argued the lawyer of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf chief Imran Khan one of the petitioners against Sharif.The opposition parties in Pakistan have taken on Sharif seeking his disqualification after the Panama Papers last year revealed that he and his sons - Hassan and Hussain and his daughter Maryam owned offshore companies which managed their family s properties. The assets in question include four expensive flats in Park Lane London.Sharif and his family has rejected the allegations. But the judges hearing the case have made observations that Sharif and his children have been unable to satisfy the court about  https://www.spreaker.com/user/thoughtforquote the sources of money used to buy these properties. The Supreme Court decision in the case is keenly awaited as it would determine the course of Pakistan s polity and with it Sharif s. An adverse decision may result in Sharif s disqualification and even snap elections. The scandal surfaced when the Panama Papers leaks last year revealed that Sharif s sons -- Hassan Nawaz and Hussain Nawaz and his daughter Maryam owned offshore companies which managed their family s properties. The assets in question include four expensive flats in Park Lane London.
Embattled Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif today contested the graft charges against him and his family in the Supreme Court saying the Panama probe panel did not produce any document to prove that he was the owner of the posh London flats which are at the centre of the high- profile case. The apex court had started hearing the scandal on Monday after the JIT submitted its final report on July 10 recommending that a corruption case be file against Sharif and his family for alleged money laundering in the 1990s when he twice served as prime minister to purchase assets in London. Sharif s lawyer Khawaja Harris stressed that the JIT did not level any specific charge of corruption against Sharif. He also said that the JIT has not produced any document to prove that Sharif 67 was the owner of the London flats. Harris s arguments were directed at the six-member JIT two of whom were from the Inter-Services Intelligence and the Military Intelligence. He said the JIT had overstepped its mandate given to it by the court and had based its findings on the documents which were of no evidentiary value as per the Pakistani laws. If Sharif loses the case in the Supreme Court it could cost him his premiership throwing Pakistan into a turmoil. Sharif has refused to quit calling the JIT report a compilation of allegations and assumptions . His decision to stay in power was endorsed by the federal cabinet last week. However the three-member apex bench observed that Sharif has not provided the details of all assets and source of income in the form of his tax returns. Justice Ijazul Ahsan said the Sharif family has not produced any document to prove that the prime minister s son Hussain Nawaz was the original owner of the London flats. He said JIT has found that Sharif s daughter Maryam was the real owner of those apartments. Justice Ejaz Afzal told Sharif s counsel that the Sharif family has not provided the money trail to establish that the London flats were legally purchased. We have been waiting for them since day one to come forward and provide the money trail he said but added that the court would decide the case on the basis of evidence and it was not bound by the findings of the JIT. Justice Azmat Saeed Sheikh raised questions about the sources of funds used to set up the Hill Metal steel company in Saudi Arabia which is allegedly owned by the Sharifs. The judges appeared quite aggressive and grilled Sharif s counsel about the source of money used to establish businesses in Gulf and the UK by the Sharif family. The real question is where did the money for family properties in Saudi Arabia Dubai and London came from? We have not yet received an answer to this fundamental question Justice Ijazul Ahsan said. The bench also asked Sharif s counsel whether the court should decide the case by its opinion over the concealment of facts or refer the case to an accountability court for trial. The counsel urged the court to decide it on merit and stressed that the JIT was biased and his client had done nothing illegal. Later finance minister Ishaq Dar s counsel began his arguments but the court adjourned the case until tomorrow. The scandal surfaced when the Panama Papers leaks last year revealed that Sharif s sons - Hassan and Hussain - and his daughter Maryam - owned offshore companies which managed their family s properties. The assets in question include four expensive flats in Park Lane London. Opposition parties say the London flats were purchased through illegal money which Sharif and his family have rejected. But so far they are unable to satisfy the court about the source of money used to purchase these properties. Meanwhile lower and higher courts in Pakistan came to a standstill today as lawyers across the country held protests demanding Sharif s resignation after a probe recommended filing a graft case against him and his family. The protests were called by Pakistan s top lawyers associations including the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) and the Supreme Court Bar Association. The courts where protests were organised did not hear any case. The Supreme Court however continued with its proceedings including hearing the Panama Papers leaks case. The Lahore High Court was also paralysed by a partial strike by the lawyers. The organisations have urged Sharif to honourably resign as he has lost the moral and legal authority to continue in his office after a joint investigation team (JIT) report accused him and his family of evading tax by setting up offshore companies to purchase high-end properties in London. Bar council Vice Chairman Ahsan Bhoon said the lawyer community has expressed solidarity with the Supreme Court and asked Sharif to step down. We have requested the Supreme Court to take the Panama Papers case to its logical end and disqualify the prime minister and other public office-holders declared guilty of corruption in the JIT report. He said the bar councils have also sought the resignation of Finance Minister Ishaq Dar Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif and the prime minister s http://www.gameinformer.com/members/thoughtforquote/default.aspx son-in-law Muhammad Safdar. The JIT report has proved that the prime minster and his family members have been involved in corruption he said adding that the apex court should refer the case to the National Accountability Bureau for a reference against the Sharif family as recommended by the JIT.
Karachi: The Pakistan Hockey Federation (PHF) has brought back mercurial centre forward Hasan Sardar as chief selector after the World Hockey League (WHL) debacle in London last month.Representational image. GettyHasan returns to the mainstream hockey for the first time since 2010 when he was chief selector and Pakistan finished at the bottom of the points table in the 12-team World Cup held in New Delhi.PHF President Brigadier (retd) Khalid Khokar is confident that Hasan is in a position to rekindle the fortunes of the Pakistan national team which finished seventh in the 10-team World Hockey League which also served as qualifiers for next year s World Cup in India.The Federation besides axing the entire national selection committee have also sacked chief coach and manager Hanif Khan and head coach Khawaja Junaid in the wake of the London debacle.